I just finished filing my tax return. Not exactly what you expect to hear at the start of a genealogy post, right? But stay with me for a minute — it connects to family history research more than you might think.
If you’ve been reading for a while, you know my husband and I used to be over-the-road truck drivers. I handled the bookkeeping. Every month I organized receipts and gave them to the accountant at tax time. I kept doing it that way out of habit, until I realized that system belonged to a different season of my life.
So I reorganized everything by tax category instead — same goal, different approach.
And that got me thinking about genealogy research.

Every research session should start with a goal and a plan. Think of it as a roadmap. Maybe you’re looking for a marriage record, confirming a birth year, or simply tracking an ancestor through census records. You decide what you want to prove and which records are most likely to answer the question.
That structure keeps you focused.
But sometimes what you find changes everything.
A single unexpected detail can shift the direction of the entire project. The question isn’t whether to adjust, it’s how to adjust without losing your original purpose.
That’s exactly what happened when I was researching my husband’s great-grandfather, James C. Lunt.
James’s Story
I had already identified James Cammett Lunt as a direct ancestor. He was born in Portland, Maine, in 1858. As usual, I started placing him in every census record he could appear in.
He is with his family in 1860 and 1870.

Next came the 1880 census. He’s a bookstore clerk, still living with his family on 14 June 1880.
Then Ancestry handed me a surprise.
Also on 14 June 1880, James C. Lunt appears in Laramie, Wyoming, working as a cattle herder. I asked my husband if he knew anything about this… and yes, he’d heard stories about one of his ancestors trying his hand at being a cowboy before settling down.
So, how can James be enumerated on the same day in two different states, over 2,000 miles apart?
After checking the census instructions to the enumerators ( United States Census Bureau website), the situation made more sense. The census recorded where a person lived on 1 June 1880, not where they were when the enumerator arrived at their door. James could have been in Portland on June 1st and in Wyoming by June 14. This also supposes that the enumerator in Laramie didn’t follow the instructions (and that happened, too).
James C. Lunt was a cattle herder working for Fielder M. Phillips in Laramie, Wyoming. And he probably didn’t go alone because another man from Maine, Frank B. Leach, was there, too. Perhaps Frank and James knew each other, as Frank was also a clerk in Portland before this adventure.
What Next?
My goal was to find James C. Lunt in every census record throughout his life. With this new, interesting story staring me in the face, do I abandon the goal and start a new one, or do I put this on my “future research” list and keep going? Not every distraction deserves attention, but this one did.
But this wasn’t a distraction, it was intentional. Census records will still be there tomorrow, but since I’m after the stories of our ancestors, this one is too juicy not to follow up on.
So I pivoted.
I made a new research plan centered on Fielder M. Phillips and the group of New England men working on that ranch. As genealogists, we are also interested in the friends/family, associates, and neighbors of our ancestors…their FAN Club. You can read more about that HERE. Who was Fielder M. Phillips, and why were there men from many different states working for him? How did they get there, and why did they go?
How Do You Know When To Change Direction?
This part is personal.
If I had been one census away from completing James’s timeline, I probably would have finished that goal first. But since I was at the beginning of his adult life, the Wyoming story mattered more than the checklist.
The real skill is learning to recognize the difference between a chance to expand your research and a bright, shiny object. Most surprises can be put on the backburner for a while. Both others are worth putting your original research plan aside and working on something new. Intentionally.
Finish processing what you found in your plan (that means writing it up, too) and make a conscious decision to change direction. You’re not abandoning your goal, you’re expanding it.
Finally
Changing how I organized receipts reminded me of something important…my original goal didn’t change, but the journey did. I just put it aside for a bit to deliberately follow something more interesting.
And honestly, that’s where we find some of the best stories.
Genealogy tip: Just because you found your ancestor in a census, it doesn’t mean they won’t show up in another one in the same year. Look for everything!
Genealogy is easier when you don’t have to figure it all out alone.
If you’d like help deciding what your next research step should be (or want reassurance that you’re on the right track) I’m happy to take a look and talk it through with you.

